- a kind of virtual social intelligence, a reaching out on Group Dynamics and Human Processes at the Workplace ( http://www.workplacecatalysts.com ) . - Foster a discretionary Presence in Groups, to enable human capability. For my online news report read or subscribe to http://paper.li/jgblr
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Very happy to see this involved sharing from an immersive research experience on change practitioners
Dr. Earon Kavanagh - Keynote Presentation on Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSacdE_htpg
Saturday, April 26, 2014
What force-fields do we experience in organisations today?
In 1989, when studying at the Tata
Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), I opted for an elective subject in
Political Science. Little did I know what a towering figure my teacher would
be. YD Phadke
may not be as celebrated beyond Maharashtra, but his analytic prowess on
society and its challenge in the wee years of economic liberalisation was not
lost on me. The criminalisation of politics, and the politicisation of crime
was a label I heard from this horse’s mouth. Nearly 2 decades after, the grip
of this trend is firm and tenacious.
Years later, I learnt that summer months activate certain
chemicals that make for greater
criminal behaviors.
At least for a few years, I watched that phenomenon
peak and ebb only to realise that December 6, October 31, and November 26 are all
winter dates for that theory to find generalisation in India. In 2014, as I
write, I cannot recall how much less incidents of violence and blood-letting
have been since the 1990s. It was in the 1990s itself, however, that academics studying
group and individual behaviors revisited what a famous scientist once mentioned
“There is nothing so practical as a good theory”.
Edgar Schein was the
first to resurrect Lewinian thinking into group relations theory. The
underlying reason being the neglect of ‘field theory’ that Kurt tried to model
as in a topological psychology from the pure sciences of physics and mathematics.
Schein and others have argued that many aspects of Lewin’s work have become
fundamental to understanding how organizations and the people
who populate them behave.
Burns and Cooke (2013) state that even modern social constructivist approaches
miss force-field theory integration, so much so that in their paper “Kurt Lewin’s
Field Theory: A Review and Re-evaluation”; they call for a restoration of field
theory. They believe that Appreciative Inquiry, for example, among other large-scale
change efforts have a fault line. That is, despite its apparent success and
appeal, it fails in widespread participatory renewal of organisations.
Cutting the chase short,
here’s what I surmised from an ongoing intervention in an apparently sunrise
industry sector, to exercise my brain muscles to attention in this regard. Let
me know if it reads meaningfully for you.
1. Unless,
employees participate in determining a company-specific way, they will
not own the intangible, inimitable strengths of diversity, uniqueness and
novelty. Sustaining the feeling of pride will be over and above an industry sector
factor
2. Speed needs calibration during this determinism, else, it will risk being experienced as forced, or contrived. Neither too slow, nor too swift, but enough for employees to set an absorbable pace. Priority will be business performance, and culture merely a reflective enabler; albeit subtly influential.
3. Ecologically sound, it is to be an effort that needs to strengthen not only company internals, but its ecosystem too. Any imbalance will indicate lack of alignment. E.g. investors are discerning constituencies in this respect.
4. Critical connects: Strategy, Identity, Operations. Miss any one, may be missing all.
5. Alignment features : performance climate, learning from others, Company manifesto, employee life-cycle, and technologically enabled (hand-device friendly collaboration tools) and aspirational enough to provide the creative tension for excellent employee contributions.
2. Speed needs calibration during this determinism, else, it will risk being experienced as forced, or contrived. Neither too slow, nor too swift, but enough for employees to set an absorbable pace. Priority will be business performance, and culture merely a reflective enabler; albeit subtly influential.
3. Ecologically sound, it is to be an effort that needs to strengthen not only company internals, but its ecosystem too. Any imbalance will indicate lack of alignment. E.g. investors are discerning constituencies in this respect.
4. Critical connects: Strategy, Identity, Operations. Miss any one, may be missing all.
5. Alignment features : performance climate, learning from others, Company manifesto, employee life-cycle, and technologically enabled (hand-device friendly collaboration tools) and aspirational enough to provide the creative tension for excellent employee contributions.
Apparently, the time for the movement away from ‘presidential’
/ oligarchic
economic systems is now. The movement toward ‘communitarian’, ‘participative’
and ecologically conscious corporations is slowed by habit and lack of
imagination than by the conception of possibilities already on offer. With cognition,
socialisation
of learning, and pace of dissemination, processes
stewarded by leadership teams will tell on the future of organisations and
our planet per se.
I will also watch out for the use of language, that may indicate what paradigms I may be stuck in. E.g. "this time around...." OR "Up until now....". Am reminiscing, finally, a quote my old school Principal, the late Rev. Fr. Vivian Lobo SJ, mentioned to me in a special exclusive evening walk "It is ideals that give meaning to practice. Practice without ideals is a troubling act".
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
When Breaking Rules is no Sin : Service of the Heart
1 Corinthians 13:13
says “12For now we see in a
mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know
fully just as I also have been fully known.13But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but
the greatest of these is love”.
In the mindless repetition
of this differentiating text from the Bible, I have seen many a wedding
solemnized, many a suffering explained away and moments of confusion managed
for the temporal convenience of clergy and the laity. The Passion Week is a reminder
past the centuries of an unparalleled traverse of the Jesus figure in its
intensity and solemnity both. The essence between the text from the Corinthians
and the experience of the Now Moment in the present, revealed itself in a
pristine view for me today. So, I record them here – partly as a re-discovery
of matters spiritual, and partly as an instrument to my own meaning making. And
no, I have not gone to the etymological, epistemological or liturgical roots of
these terms. So they come minted with the scent of my own till that the world
has suffered for me.
Faith is supposed to be a
dive into the unknown, and yet, it presupposes a lot. Faith per se is a call to
action. On the face of it, it seems a simple, pure and unqualified act of
trust. Faith however, rests on the actor’s past. It summons a judgment in the
moment between choices in favour of the one choice presented for appeal. Such judgment
arises only if the actor has a past experience of matters from which to discern
the worth of the judgment call. Hence faith is past-dependent, despite its
glory in the present.
Hope is a beacon of aspiration,
aligned with an experience yet to be. It signals a poise of uncovering inner
potential whether passive, dormant or active. Hope is a form of reliability in
unborn futures, separating the moment from the burdens yet to be borne; and yet
giving meaning to today’s yokes. Hope is
a tempering of the Spirit, the enmeshment of the Larger Mind within us that
connects with what is larger than us.
But spirituality is not
just through the mind’s intellect. Spirituality is also through our body and
emotions. Transformations happen when we ready ourselves in the moment to
receive love. Love exists in the present. We may never know in our lifetimes,
as we know it, where Love comes from. It is only in the receiving, that we can
recognize Love. In Love, we die to the moment. In this death, we renew
ourselves. Mindfulness allows us to integrate what we sense through body and
emotion into Love. For Love is a decision, that embeds many a moments of emotion,
but is not an emotion of itself. Love is the giving of all you are in the
moment you make that decision.
Love can bear all things,
if we experience the Presence of Eternity. Forgiving Love is a decision to
dissociate feelings and emotions with the person whose acts may have hurt us in
the past. Merciful Love is a decision to be in service of the heart, where
compassion is a state of accurate empathy with the other’s feelings, and yet,
in such service; one breaks known rules of engagement. Love is in the giving.
And since each moment is new; when expressed, Love bears authenticity, an
originality born of an awareness of the moment.
Integrating the Past and the
Future in the Present may seem difficult. In surrender to the moment, not
insisting on what we desire, but experiencing from a wholeness to deserve the
bounty of resources in the moment, Grace becomes an amazing feature. Grace is
the mystical, unmerited mercy, whose gift is like the synesthetic synapse of
laughter and tears at the same time. The Presence of Eternity, then alters our
perception of time itself. If as the Bible Says, that the Greatest of these is
Love, mindful present-awareness has a premium over Past–dependent Faith and
Future-oriented Hope.
Yet, the moment contains the humble connotations of the
connected tenses. This is a new meaningfulness for me today. If you let me know
what this means for you, I shall be much obliged.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)